Bow v. State Highway Commission

55 S.W.2d 341, 246 Ky. 564, 1932 Ky. LEXIS 781
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedDecember 16, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 S.W.2d 341 (Bow v. State Highway Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bow v. State Highway Commission, 55 S.W.2d 341, 246 Ky. 564, 1932 Ky. LEXIS 781 (Ky. 1932).

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Affirming.

. Property belonging to Ellen Bow and eight others was taken for the construction of a highway, and Ellen Bow alone had appealed.

The statement of appeal filed reads, “Ellen Bow et al., Appellants,” but such expressions as “et al.,” “etc.,” “and others,” and “&c.,” are absolutely meaningless in a statement filed under section 739 of the Code of Civil Practice.

No exceptions had been filed to the _ report of the commissioners; therefore there was no issue made in the trial court and nothing to complain of here.

This concludes no one but Ellen Bow, as she is the only appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Wells
72 S.W.2d 476 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)
Gray v. Greer
70 S.W.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 S.W.2d 341, 246 Ky. 564, 1932 Ky. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bow-v-state-highway-commission-kyctapphigh-1932.