Bow v. State Highway Commission
This text of 55 S.W.2d 341 (Bow v. State Highway Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
. Property belonging to Ellen Bow and eight others was taken for the construction of a highway, and Ellen Bow alone had appealed.
The statement of appeal filed reads, “Ellen Bow et al., Appellants,” but such expressions as “et al.,” “etc.,” “and others,” and “&c.,” are absolutely meaningless in a statement filed under section 739 of the Code of Civil Practice.
No exceptions had been filed to the _ report of the commissioners; therefore there was no issue made in the trial court and nothing to complain of here.
This concludes no one but Ellen Bow, as she is the only appellant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 S.W.2d 341, 246 Ky. 564, 1932 Ky. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bow-v-state-highway-commission-kyctapphigh-1932.