Bovino v. McDonalds Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bovino v. McDonalds Corp.

509 So. 2d 991, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9362

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1987·No. No. 4-86-2000·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We cite, with approval, the language of Smith v. Markowitz, 486 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1986), and affirm this cause upon the authority of that case. Policemen, while discharging their duties, are subject to the Firemen’s Rule. True, there are exceptions to that rule, but none of them are present in the case at bar.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We cite, with approval, the language of Smith v. Markowitz, 486 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1986), and affirm this cause upon the authority of that case. Policemen, while discharging their duties, are subject to the Firemen’s Rule. True, there are exceptions to that rule, but none of them are present in the case at bar.

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Bovino v. McDonalds Corp., 509 So. 2d 991, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9362 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

509 So. 2d 991 (Bovino v. McDonalds Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related