Bovino v. McDonalds Corp.
509 So. 2d 991, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9362
This text of 509 So. 2d 991 (Bovino v. McDonalds Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bovino v. McDonalds Corp., 509 So. 2d 991, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9362 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
We cite, with approval, the language of Smith v. Markowitz, 486 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1986), and affirm this cause upon the authority of that case. Policemen, while discharging their duties, are subject to the Firemen’s Rule. True, there are exceptions to that rule, but none of them are present in the case at bar.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. Markowitz
486 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
509 So. 2d 991, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bovino-v-mcdonalds-corp-fladistctapp-1987.