Bovin v. Galitzka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bovin v. Galitzka

223 A.D. 737

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D. 737 (Bovin v. Galitzka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bovin v. Galitzka, 223 A.D. 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and orders reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion of defendant Philip Schorr for judgment on the pleadings denied, and plaintiff’s motion to strike out the second defense in the answer of defendant Philip Schorr granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the language contained in the lease in question constituted a restriction of the use of the premises to the purpose named. (De Forest v. Byrne, 1 Hilt. 43.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur. [131 Misc. 479, 482.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and orders reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, motion of defendant Philip Schorr for judgment on the pleadings denied, and plaintiff’s motion to strike out the second defense in the answer of defendant Philip Schorr granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the language contained in the lease in question constituted a restriction of the use of the premises to the purpose named. (De Forest v. Byrne, 1 Hilt. 43.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur. [131 Misc. 479, 482.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bovin-v-galitzka-nyappdiv-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack