Bove v. Rosenthal
470 So. 2d 108, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14368
Opinion
We affirm upon a finding that the trial court’s refusal to grant a continuance did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Sandegren v. State ex rel. Sarasota County Public Hospital Board, 397 So.2d 657 (Fla.1981); Barclay v. Rivero, 388 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bove v. Rosenthal, 470 So. 2d 108, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
470 So. 2d 108 (Bove v. Rosenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barclay v. Rivero
388 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Sandegren v. STATE, ETC.
397 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)