Bove v. Rosenthal

470 So. 2d 108, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14368
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1914
StatusPublished

This text of 470 So. 2d 108 (Bove v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bove v. Rosenthal, 470 So. 2d 108, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm upon a finding that the trial court’s refusal to grant a continuance did not constitute an abuse of discretion. Sandegren v. State ex rel. Sarasota County Public Hospital Board, 397 So.2d 657 (Fla.1981); Barclay v. Rivero, 388 So.2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barclay v. Rivero
388 So. 2d 321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Sandegren v. STATE, ETC.
397 So. 2d 657 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
470 So. 2d 108, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1449, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bove-v-rosenthal-fladistctapp-1985.