Bove v. Department of Correctional Services

105 A.D.3d 1285, 963 N.Y.S.2d 605

This text of 105 A.D.3d 1285 (Bove v. Department of Correctional Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bove v. Department of Correctional Services, 105 A.D.3d 1285, 963 N.Y.S.2d 605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was dispatched to a hospital. Drug tests performed at the hospital and upon his return to the prison indicated that he had unprescribed antidepressants in his system. He was charged with violating various prison disciplinary rules as a result and, following a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of drug use and possessing unauthorized medication. Petitioner’s administrative appeal was unsuccessful, and he thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

The misbehavior report, testimony of the nurse who authored it, and petitioner’s multiple positive drug test results provide substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Reese v Bezio, 75 AD3d 1029, 1029 [2010]). Petitioner’s claim that his prescribed medications could cause a false positive result was contradicted by the nurse, who testified that both a pharmacy and an outside testing laboratory had ruled out such an outcome, and the resulting credibility issue was properly resolved by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Curry v Fischer, 93 AD3d 984, 984 [2012]; Matter of Lunney v Selsky, 34 AD3d 955, 956 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 802 [2007]; cf. Matter of Townes v Fischer, 68 AD3d 1294, 1295 [2009]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and, to the extent they are properly preserved for our review, find them to he without merit.

Peters, P.J., Mercure, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

[1286]*1286Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lunney v. Selsky
34 A.D.3d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Townes v. Fischer
68 A.D.3d 1294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Reese v. Bezio
75 A.D.3d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Curry v. Fischer
93 A.D.3d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.D.3d 1285, 963 N.Y.S.2d 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bove-v-department-of-correctional-services-nyappdiv-2013.