Bove v. Bove, No. Fa88 0093704 S (Jun. 24, 1993)
Opinion
The payment due June 24, 1991 was not made. It was in the sum of $550,000.00.
The language concerning interest provides: "In addition to the wife's rights of contempt, in the event said funds are not paid on a timely basis, interest of eighteen (18%) percent shall be charged after June 24, 1991."
Although it is unclear as to what eighteen percent means, Page 6, Article A2 spells out "eighteen percent per annum." The court can logically conclude that the eighteen percent is per annum.
The dispute after hearing the evidence is whether or not the amount should be awarded at compound interest on a monthly, yearly or quarterly basis. The court finds that the agreement is silent and finds that it is appropriate to award interest at simple interest not compound interest and, accordingly, that is the order CT Page 6220-hhh of the court. See, Loomis Loomis Inc., v. Stecker et al,
KARAZIN, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 6220-fff (Bove v. Bove, No. Fa88 0093704 S (Jun. 24, 1993)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.