Bove Finishing Co. v. Wertsville Industries, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Bove Finishing Co. v. Wertsville Industries, Inc.

5 N.Y.2d 934

DecidedJanuary 22, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.Y.2d 934 (Bove Finishing Co. v. Wertsville Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bove Finishing Co. v. Wertsville Industries, Inc., 5 N.Y.2d 934 (N.Y. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of Appellate Division modified by dismissing the third cause of action, insofar as it sets forth a claim for loss of profits, upon the ground that the evidence is insuEcient as a matter of law to support the finding that defendant was chargeable for loss of profits in the amount of $1,425 and, as so modified, aErmed in all other respects with costs to respondent. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judges Fund and Froessel dissent and vote to aErm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of Appellate Division modified by dismissing the third cause of action, insofar as it sets forth a claim for loss of profits, upon the ground that the evidence is insuEcient as a matter of law to support the finding that defendant was chargeable for loss of profits in the amount of $1,425 and, as so modified, aErmed in all other respects with costs to respondent. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judges Fund and Froessel dissent and vote to aErm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 N.Y.2d 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bove-finishing-co-v-wertsville-industries-inc-ny-1959.