Bouza v. United States
This text of 52 F. App'x 373 (Bouza v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[374]*374ORDER
The district court’s order applying Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), retroactively to grant Appellee’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is REVERSED and REMANDED. See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir.2002) (“We hold that the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively on initial collateral review----”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 48, — L.Ed.2d - (2002); Rees v. Hill, 286 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir.2002) (applying same rule to second or successive petition).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F. App'x 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouza-v-united-states-ca9-2002.