Bouza v. United States

52 F. App'x 373
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 9, 2002·No. No. 01-56925; D.C. Nos. CV-01-01119-JNK, CR-90-00856-JNK·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[374] ORDER**

The district court’s order applying Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), retroactively to grant Appellee’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is REVERSED and REMANDED. See United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir.2002) (“We hold that the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively on initial collateral review----”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 48, — L.Ed.2d - (2002); Rees v. Hill, 286 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir.2002) (applying same rule to second or successive petition).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bouza v. United States, 52 F. App'x 373 (9th Cir. 2002).

52 F. App'x 373 (Bouza v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soto Bouza v. United States
538 U.S. 1046 (Supreme Court, 2003)