Bouyer v. City of Enterprise

59 So. 188, 4 Ala. App. 292, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 304
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bouyer v. City of Enterprise. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Ala. App. 276
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1912·Published

Opinion

PELHAM, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the mayor’s court of the city of Enterprise, and ap[293]*293pealed to the circuit court. The complaint alleged the violation of an ordinance of the city of Enterprise against selling, giving away, or exchanging spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors. The ordinance introduced on the trial did not correspond with the averments of the complaint. The complaint was for the violation of an ordinance prohibiting, among other acts, giving away or exchanging, and the ordinance introduced contained no such prohibition. The question was properly raised when the ordinance was offered in evidence, and on the authority of Bouyer v. City of Enterprise, infra, 58 South. 755, this case must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bouyer v. City of Enterprise, 59 So. 188, 4 Ala. App. 292, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 304 (Ala. Ct. App. 1912).

59 So. 188 (Bouyer v. City of Enterprise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. State
58 So. 755 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)