Boustead Securities, LLC v. Leaping Group Co., Ltd
This text of Boustead Securities, LLC v. Leaping Group Co., Ltd (Boustead Securities, LLC v. Leaping Group Co., Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DATE FILED: 5/2025 _ Boustead Securities, LLC, Plaintiff, ORDER -V- 20-CV-03749 (VEC) (HJR) Leaping Group Co., Ltd., and ATIF Holdings Limited, Defendants.
HENRY J. RICARDO, United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to this Court’s October 25, 2024, Scheduling Order for Damages Inquest, on December 6, 2024, Boustead Securities, LLC (““Boustead”) filed a Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (“Prop. Findings”) and an Affidavit of Jack I. Siegal in Support (“Siegal Affidavit”) concerning all damages and relief permitted under the entry of default judgment. Dkt. Nos. 184-186. For the following reasons, I am unable to make a determination on the inquest based solely on Boustead’s written submissions. “Where a defaulting defendant has not made any submission on a damages inquest, the Court must assess whether the plaintiff has provided a sufficient basis for the Court to determine damages.” Lenard v. Design Studio, 889 F. Supp. 2d 518, 527 (S.D.N.Y 2012). Damages can only be based on admissible evidence. Am. Jewish Comm. v. Berman, No. 15-CV5983 (LAK) (JLC), 2016 WL 3365318, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. June 15, 2016), adopted by 2016 WL 4532201 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2016). More specifically, “a plaintiff must submit sufficient evidence in the form of detailed
affidavits and other documentary materials to enable the district court to ‘establish damages with reasonable certainty.’” Nat’l Photo Grp., LLC v. Bigstar Entm’t, Inc., No. 13-CV-5467 (VSB) (JLC), 2014 WL 1396543, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 11, 2014)
(quoting Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp., 109 F.3d 105, 111 (2d Cir. 1997)), adopted by 2014 WL 5051275 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2014); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Boustead’s written submissions are insufficient to independently establish damages, as the evidence substantiating their claims—the Expert Disclosure of Patrick O’Shea—is inadmissible hearsay. See Proposed Findings; Exhibit A, Siegel
Affidavit, Dkt. No. 186. Mr. O’Shea has not himself submitted an affidavit; his Expert Disclosure was prepared by counsel and submitted in an arbitration proceeding between Boustead and former defendant ATIF Holdings Limited. See id. The supporting affidavit from plaintiff’s counsel, Jack Siegel, asserting that the Disclosure had not been edited since its submission in the arbitration proceedings, is not a substitute for Mr. O’Shea’s own sworn statement confirming the truth of the assertions in his Disclosure. See Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA), Inc. v. Alcantara,
183 F.3d 151, 155 (2d. Cir. 1999) (holding that the allegations in the complaint and supporting affidavit of plaintiff’s counsel were not sufficient evidence to alone establish the amount of damages); see generally Fed. R. Ev. 801(c). Separately, the Disclosure itself does not provide a sufficiently detailed explanation of the methodologies and reasoning underlying Mr. O’Shea’s damages calculations. Given this lack of detail and Plaintiff’s reliance on Mr. O’Shea’s analysis in its written submissions for relief upon the default judgment, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Court will hold a hearing on the default judgment on April 23 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 21D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. If “it is necessary to take account or determine the amount of damages...the court may conduct such hearings or order such references as it deems necessary and proper.” Credit Lyonnais, 183 F. 3d 151 at 154 (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2)). 2. Plaintiff □□ directed to have Mr. Patrick O’Shea appear and provide sworn testimony concerning his conclusion as to the amount of damages and the methods of analysis described in his Expert Disclosure; in particular, the basis for the specific inputs chosen for the Black-Scholes model. SO ORDERED. ‘ oy Dated: April 3, 2025 f : New York, New York Fa \. shed Henry Ricardo | United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Boustead Securities, LLC v. Leaping Group Co., Ltd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boustead-securities-llc-v-leaping-group-co-ltd-nysd-2025.