Bousman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bousman v. State

1919 OK CR 96, 179 P. 785, 15 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 102

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 8, 1919

DocketNo. A-3155.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 96 (Bousman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bousman v. State, 1919 OK CR 96, 179 P. 785, 15 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 102 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, H. E. Bousman, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge that he did have in his possession 304 half pints of whisky, 23 pints of whisky, 9 quarts .of gin and 179 pints of beer, with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $150. Prom the judgment he appeals. > •

No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error when the ease was called for final submission. Whereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute .the appeal. For this reason the judgment • herein is affirmed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, H. E. Bousman, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge that he did have in his possession 304 half pints of whisky, 23 pints of whisky, 9 quarts .of gin and 179 pints of beer, with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $150. Prom the judgment he appeals. > •

No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error when the ease was called for final submission. Whereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute .the appeal. For this reason the judgment • herein is affirmed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause the judgment and sentence to be carried into execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 96, 179 P. 785, 15 Okla. Crim. 682, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bousman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.