Bours v. Tuckerman
7 Johns. 538
Opinion
The defendant was privileged from arrest, as it appears that he had no opportunity to apply to the court below to be discharged, and as this court ought not to suffer its process to be executed in violation of the privileges of other courts, the defendant must be discharged from the bail-bond, and the arrest, on filing common bail, unless the plaintiff should elect, as he may, to waive the arrest altogether, and issue new process.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bours v. Tuckerman, 7 Johns. 538 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
7 Johns. 538 (Bours v. Tuckerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickinson v. Farwell
51 A. 624 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)
People ex rel. Hess v. Flansburg
26 N.Y.S. 329 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Christian v. Williams
20 S.W. 96 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Ex parte Schulenburg
25 F. 211 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1885)
Larned v. Griffin
12 F. 590 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1882)
Jones v. Knauss
31 N.J. Eq. 211 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1879)
Thompson's Case
122 Mass. 428 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)
Treichler v. Hauck
1 Foster 98 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1873)
Proctor v. Walker
12 Ind. 660 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)
State v. Hooker
17 Vt. 658 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1845)
Sanford v. Chase
3 Cow. 381 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)
Taft v. Hoppin
1 Ant. N.P. Cas. 255 (New York Supreme Court, 1816)