Bourne v. Buffington

125 Mass. 481, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 110
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 125 Mass. 481 (Bourne v. Buffington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bourne v. Buffington, 125 Mass. 481, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 110 (Mass. 1878).

Opinion

By the Court.

Assuming the bills of sale made three years before to be material to the issue on trial, no error is shown in the exclusion of secondary evidence of them. Whether sufficient notice to produce the originals had been given, was a question of fact for the decision of the presiding judge. The answer of the plaintiff’s counsel to the request made at the beginning of the trial, “ that the plaintiff did not have them in his posses* [483]*483sion,” might well be understood to mean that he did not then have them with him.

The defendant not claiming under proceedings in bankruptcy or insolvency, no error is shown in the refusal or omission of instructions. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Freitas
2 Mass. App. Dec. 130 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1942)
R. J. Caldwell Co. v. Cushnoc Paper Co.
96 A. 730 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 Mass. 481, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bourne-v-buffington-mass-1878.