Bourlon v. Waggaman

28 La. Ann. 481
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1876
DocketNo. 6144
StatusPublished

This text of 28 La. Ann. 481 (Bourlon v. Waggaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bourlon v. Waggaman, 28 La. Ann. 481 (La. 1876).

Opinion

Howell, J.

Mrs. Mary Clancy, having judgments against tho firm of [482]*482Hesso & Verges and against H. Verges, one of said firm, issued execution and seized fifteen hogsheads of sugar as belonging to said H. Verges. The plaintiff, wife of Verges, and separate in property, enjoined the sale, claiming the sugar as raised on a plantation which she purchased after judgment of separation and cultivated with funds obtained on hoi” sole credit. The plaintiff in execution attacked the validity of tho judgment of separation, because fraudulently rendered; because rendered by. consent; because rendered upon insufficient allegations and without-proof; and because it was never executed. Judgment was rendered dissolving the injunction, and plaintiff appealed.

In this court she pleads tho prescription of one year.

The record shows that more than one year elapsed between the dates of either the judgments of the seizing creditor or of the wife for separation and tho date of this proceeding or the date of the seizure enjoined. Tho plea of prescription must prevail. See 14 An. 106; 23 An. 546; 24 An. 022.

It is therefore ordered that tho judgment appealed from be reversed, and that there bo judgment in favor of plaintiff perpetuating tho injunction herein, with costs in both courts.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 La. Ann. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bourlon-v-waggaman-la-1876.