Bourland v. Gibson

26 Ill. App. 416, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 276
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 18, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ill. App. 416 (Bourland v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bourland v. Gibson, 26 Ill. App. 416, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 276 (Ill. Ct. App. 1887).

Opinion

Per Quriami.

This case was here last at the May term, 1886 (21 Ill. App. 43). Ho statement of the case is deemed necessary. Since it was remanded the plaintiff filed an additional replication setting np that he had not refused to deliver the deed, to which the court properly sustained a demurrer. The plea'showed a defense that the note was given for the consideration of the deed, which was not delivered, not met by the replication.

The issue of fact was then submitted to the jury and was found for the defendant. There was sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and this is the only point now left for consideration. The judgment will be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bourland v. Gibson
21 Ill. App. 43 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ill. App. 416, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bourland-v-gibson-illappct-1887.