Bourke v. City of New York
This text of 277 A.D.2d 783 (Bourke v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action against the City of New York and the owner of adjacent property to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a fall upon a two-level sidewalk, judgment dismissing the complaint as against the property owner upon the verdict of the jury, and dismissing the complaint as against the city [784]*784upon the direction of the trial court setting aside the verdict against the city, unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion no negligence upon the part of respondents was established on the trial, and there was no error upon the trial affecting a substantial right of appellant. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See post, p. 950.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bourke-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1950.