Bourjaily v. United States

479 U.S. 881, 107 S. Ct. 268, 93 L. Ed. 2d 246, 55 U.S.L.W. 3257, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 4210
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1986
DocketNo. 85-6725
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 479 U.S. 881 (Bourjaily v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bourjaily v. United States, 479 U.S. 881, 107 S. Ct. 268, 93 L. Ed. 2d 246, 55 U.S.L.W. 3257, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 4210 (1986).

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted and certiorari granted limited to the following questions:

“1. Whether, in order to admit an alleged co-conspirator’s declarations against a defendant under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(E), the court must determine by independent evidence a) that a conspiracy existed, and b) that the declarant and the defendant were members of this conspiracy?

“2. Assuming that the court must make these determinations, upon what quantum of independent proof must they be based?

“3. Whether, as a requirement for the admission of a co-conspirator’s statement against a defendant, the court must assess the circumstances of the case to determine whether the statement [882]*882carries with it sufficient indicia of reliability?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. DiSalvo
663 F. Supp. 145 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 U.S. 881, 107 S. Ct. 268, 93 L. Ed. 2d 246, 55 U.S.L.W. 3257, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 4210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bourjaily-v-united-states-scotus-1986.