Bourgoin v. Gillette Co.
814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127739, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 243
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on November 23, 2011, be and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bourgoin v. Gillette Co., 814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127739, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 243 (Mich. 2012).
814 N.W.2d 357 (Bourgoin v. Gillette Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)