Bourgoin v. Gillette Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Bourgoin v. Gillette Co.

814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127739, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 243

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 7, 2012

DocketNo. A11-2288

StatusPublished

This text of 814 N.W.2d 357 (Bourgoin v. Gillette Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bourgoin v. Gillette Co., 814 N.W.2d 357, 2012 WL 2127739, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 243 (Mich. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on November 23, 2011, be and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

M_ Christopher J. Dietzen Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI