BOURE v. State
290 S.W.3d 195, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2009 WL 2501002
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Stephan Boure, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, movant argues that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by coercing him to plead guilty.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BOURE v. State, 290 S.W.3d 195, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172, 2009 WL 2501002 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
290 S.W.3d 195 (BOURE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wickham v. State
290 S.W.3d 195 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)