Bourbonnais v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Bourbonnais v. State

1920 OK CR 207, 192 P. 1106, 18 Okla. Crim. 707, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 190

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 12, 1920

DocketNo. A-3551.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 207 (Bourbonnais v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bourbonnais v. State, 1920 OK CR 207, 192 P. 1106, 18 Okla. Crim. 707, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 190 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted on an information, charging that he did unlawfully convey intoxicating liquor, to wit, chock beer, and his punishment fixed at 30 days confinement in the county jail and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on, the 29th day of March, 1919, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on May 24, 1919, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. The Attorney General has moved to affirm for failure to prosecute Ithe appeal.

Finding nothing in the record to indicate that the defendant did not have a fata trial, the 'judgment is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted on an information, charging that he did unlawfully convey intoxicating liquor, to wit, chock beer, and his punishment fixed at 30 days confinement in the county jail and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on, the 29th day of March, 1919, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on May 24, 1919, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed. The Attorney General has moved to affirm for failure to prosecute Ithe appeal.

Finding nothing in the record to indicate that the defendant did not have a fata trial, the 'judgment is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 207, 192 P. 1106, 18 Okla. Crim. 707, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bourbonnais-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.