Bourassa v. State

684 So. 2d 869, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13057, 1996 WL 721574
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1996·No. No. 95-04221·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Glen J. Bourassa, challenges an order revoking his community control and his subsequent sentence. Because the state concedes error on the two issues raised by Bour-assa, we reverse.

Bourassa was charged with a violation of community control which the trial court specifically found was not willful. A probation or community control violation, in order to cause revocation, must be willful and substantial. Hightower v. State, 529 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Because of our decision on this issue, the sentencing issue raised by Bourassa is moot. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to reinstate Bourassa’s community control.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J.,. and SCHOONOVER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bourassa v. State, 684 So. 2d 869, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13057, 1996 WL 721574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

684 So. 2d 869 (Bourassa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buckins v. State
789 So. 2d 1184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Remich v. State
696 So. 2d 1270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)