Bounds v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bounds v. State

502 S.W.3d 687, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2016 WL 4362120

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2016·No. No. ED 103235·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jack L. Bounds appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief due to abandonment. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous;-An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jack L. Bounds appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief due to abandonment. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous;-An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Bounds v. State, 502 S.W.3d 687, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2016 WL 4362120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

502 S.W.3d 687 (Bounds v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.