Bounds v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bounds v. State

502 S.W.3d 687, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2016 WL 4362120

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 16, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103235

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 687 (Bounds v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bounds v. State, 502 S.W.3d 687, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2016 WL 4362120 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jack L. Bounds appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief due to abandonment. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous;-An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jack L. Bounds appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief due to abandonment. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous;-An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 687, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 775, 2016 WL 4362120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bounds-v-state-moctapp-2016.