Boulware v. M'Comb

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Boulware v. M'Comb

16 S.C.L. 416

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Johnson.

The principle on which this question depends, is founded on the maxirn qui facit per odium, facit per se. The act of the agent is in law the act of the principal, and although it might have been more strictly clerical to set out the manner, yet the legal effect of an act is all that is indispensably necessary. The allegation that the defendant subscribed with his own proper hand was therefore well,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Johnson.

The principle on which this question depends, is founded on the maxirn qui facit per odium, facit per se. The act of the agent is in law the act of the principal, and although it might have been more strictly clerical to set out the manner, yet the legal effect of an act is all that is indispensably necessary. The allegation that the defendant subscribed with his own proper hand was therefore well,

Boulware v. M'Comb, 16 S.C.L. 416 (S.C. 1824).

Pincite

16 S.C.L. 416 (Boulware v. M'Comb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.