Boulware v. M'Comb

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Boulware v. M'Comb

16 S.C.L. 416

DecidedNovember 15, 1824

StatusPublished

This text of 16 S.C.L. 416 (Boulware v. M'Comb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boulware v. M'Comb, 16 S.C.L. 416 (S.C. 1824).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Johnson.

The principle on which this question depends, is founded on the maxirn qui facit per odium, facit per se. The act of the agent is in law the act of the principal, and although it might have been more strictly clerical to set out the manner, yet the legal effect of an act is all that is indispensably necessary. The allegation that the defendant subscribed with his own proper hand was therefore well,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Johnson.

The principle on which this question depends, is founded on the maxirn qui facit per odium, facit per se. The act of the agent is in law the act of the principal, and although it might have been more strictly clerical to set out the manner, yet the legal effect of an act is all that is indispensably necessary. The allegation that the defendant subscribed with his own proper hand was therefore well,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 S.C.L. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boulware-v-mcomb-sc-1824.