Boulware v. Laughrun

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 25, 2002
• Docket: 02-6860
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6860

JAMES ALVIN BOULWARE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE V. LAUGHRUN, II, Private Attorney; ZORO J. GUICE, JR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-171-MU)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Alvin Boulware, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

James Alvin Boulware appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint brought under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2002) and 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) (1994). We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Boulware v. Laughrun, No. CA-02-171-MU (W.D.N.C. filed

May 15, 2002; entered Mary 16, 2002). We deny Boulware’s motion

for a certificate of appealability as unnecessary. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED