Boulukos v. 213 P.A.S., L.L.P
4 N.Y.3d 737
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the subsequently entered Supreme Court judgment, dismissed upon the ground that simultaneous appeals do not lie to the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals (see Parker v Rogerson, 35 NY2d 751, 753 [1974]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boulukos v. 213 P.A.S., L.L.P, 4 N.Y.3d 737 (N.Y. 2004).
4 N.Y.3d 737 (Boulukos v. 213 P.A.S., L.L.P) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parker v. Rogerson
320 N.E.2d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)