Boulevard Corp. v. Saul

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Boulevard Corp. v. Saul

134 A. 921, 4 N.J. Misc. 853, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 101

DecidedOctober 13, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A. 921 (Boulevard Corp. v. Saul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boulevard Corp. v. Saul, 134 A. 921, 4 N.J. Misc. 853, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 101 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Eelator desires a building permit, and has complied with all municipal requirements as contained in the building code. No zoning ordinance is involved. Permit seems to have been refused because some of the neighbors objected.

When this case was opened for argument on October 6th, counsel for the city was apprised that relator seemed to be plainly entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus, and that such writ would be awarded unless some cause to the contrary appeared in the brief of the city, not then ready, but which was to be submitted within five days.

Such brief has been submitted, and we have examined it, and do not find therein any sufficient defense to the award of a writ; which is accordingly allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Eelator desires a building permit, and has complied with all municipal requirements as contained in the building code. No zoning ordinance is involved. Permit seems to have been refused because some of the neighbors objected.

When this case was opened for argument on October 6th, counsel for the city was apprised that relator seemed to be plainly entitled to a peremptory writ of mandamus, and that such writ would be awarded unless some cause to the contrary appeared in the brief of the city, not then ready, but which was to be submitted within five days.

Such brief has been submitted, and we have examined it, and do not find therein any sufficient defense to the award of a writ; which is accordingly allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A. 921, 4 N.J. Misc. 853, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boulevard-corp-v-saul-nj-1926.