Boulds, Robert Keven

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 19, 2015·No. WR-72,089-09·Published

Opinion

7§ 03174<)@1

/2£‘21,/42\~///§ cL E\/)LL/)~//’af`/ )l/e/Jr/`/xj

' RECE\VED\ \N COURT OF CR\M\NA\. APPEALS

/UD\}€IY\ 1313 ./5`4 313/53 NGV“'!§LB;»ZD\§§

Abe\ Acosta', C\e'k

D. ,,~ cl';,~)z ' /DE.// i[) mm|m QZ\Z/)AZZ F,/e¢/ //7 `¢Ae.- 41 /`/O)£ €CAE' l/l// 817/_//3_5€/;/ 077/ /;/)/)//ZL,%O/? /AD/' C)n /JLx/'D/` -7/;¢¢9 A¢)¢`Lz;_/

pUVSLl£/H

\/DIB In[l"l//J£;:£ //[JD)IP

FJ$léi|/lfi `\'\/w flale ,»,Q 91 9)~¢€. 54 3 »» , l`~lf&. §)S`)l j~D OAY\ er 1\€_ \"‘HO §\S U/`.xl,;:]rD ill F/:/¢c)xx~;jé£_£c>/cx/L):/%¢ ;J/`AM

~H> QNE. c\ FE;,,-_ ‘;'_`md ,. . M: cv L/ m\| comp/ami of fmi/753 il /e§;/;L\;u/ c[:j;[x~§§x:f/M) C[Mcpmm`é

xii/§§ +h @C‘_“_L (Qq '§Dé)m""/ f3»p >[]/3/'19¢~,L9 <_\/1'\/9 cm D~r'>)`r\ic)r) (l)@lad

Qxcl\|l/)B “fo_»~l 4 SB,LO ~:'pm§d,[:)_( ;;,l)§/S)QE _DLM“)Z t;% )03/,:6;1%/}:(4./ /Q/)Af'&/_S /70§

CDD\Y\¢OV\ which ;\ G,L§O th/OS|°C/ ha ld)_€co..\ CDr/)u;\

:r)/l Cv"\/r @l;/` /_//;`¢ /:_'m[’”§§ Qh// &)/M/xs/on op ~e /(7/,¢§l D)\~!.~ f;Duv-l gp /j/C,rr,§ [:;,07/%- /Y

T'ni§ document contains some

pages that are of poor quality / at the time of imaging. 'é/£/W/é /U_, -'/ 4

/;\d at . _ * _ %’@1~€4>¢ /f, §MA,,A/ _ / /:)r /D;)/ /

{:r>Lm‘W ldf P®~MVF

)

~\-191`15 Pja`i 139951>19\£1\|¥ QHJQFMA Rabe'rlr 14 `E)c,ulcl$ cjadr»re. 4~\\9.3¥91~\»129|

\\1>\.\>§51

A CJ:\I mmi 15 RD|D€.¥"L K BD.LL]C\.$.)IOM Cd-l~l'19r!_1>1£>12, £¢mi)e~l£-ln~}~ 45 mal

\\ l`}" >l"|l;`._§ Y`€.£|£C~\ 91- 9_ l\ ,~\- p_h-L (;1 r pfl ~LL\, ‘l L'\ r \ £D’L.)r\’¥;i £Lu\,?,r' 1,1~.1/1.11191…“» 9991:1911111_&1,9_"91‘:1:.:1:;;:1 1919 115

QC\ LDZB\(D

_T\N> \wali[_~lmenl m Lc.1 ;\9 )Uc> C\Ci[e?)\b> 1b m1551`r1§3 Mr€&(:)}) \\Jer`§ \m\lrlon+ P\9_rY\Qr\-¥S `L.\>NL.)/\ mgke._\, \/19.\\/11 liL-\an-L“ \[DIB

®E\ em€n~\ § M ib§m §§ ||;RM DATE !,BP gman _:uF\ _@'Y'N. Dr\":\`mo_\ F\e gjrcmp BCAC Q~>m 349 \3`1<9\9`11} (’_\erk§ BULE,

@\G€ \¢% 499 Bi§~\m`[~t» A~Hmme.‘t 139 151/19 131z 1015/999 3581%~\014‘ 3 319119;¥1"& D/a pea-\H'\len 1912 314132\~\@1'199 rim/1 'E>rm A \liz>lc>lrh>n c_\p A\~J~ 39 (_\Q`I{»><.

C‘.l>c@ C`mm. 9 ‘ ¥h99u¥h il\llc>d:m;>rr;hr§ 9 \Y\g ¥`|Jm€n"{' V\)Dl)'; i'\€.§l|)(:)i[ P_ LUE:¥`[L o dil\~:l::\' \\/’)\[v-,\:`B\`m L'.\"’SL-»\’ 540:7{`-8' ap \n

__`

"‘L`l’\ mm~lr'\ D€( lmr\hat|hh b 11 /RD'¥AEQ~L 14 Br>uh]_§ adm ~L\he ' arson Cmd bwn§ 1999.99.:14|`/ mer c»~|'€f.l m ~H'\€. WL£M_CM\`MN§;_T l U_”(_` \99_\£11» l,\r) div §rl&l‘l iv llc PQr<\Lsr~‘l

h C)FCD\"(LY\S `LD m\{ he `if "H'\o pn€_ °3~1€. \V\ ‘M'\e. [.\\§l\.»\\i*_ A§Eid£:\\\`\~\ (`.\\"&'\~rue. Cnn¢_.l 1201 reg.]., uT/` A. {`j\ij`(l(.`l`+ `+R@m\l\'>r\p 1))3._[331_;_']_3)9_9_(2(:)3_._.

E\'ec.l,rl:¢[ Dn ¢A/;s._[i¢_h_`_ 61£11\/ 939 Mc)\le__%’i)er _

§§ il°'/5//733¢ (_`:_C,‘; . YUM ;<' §12§91§1:! 91311~191 A'

939 )'L>Cl

S’I'A'I`Iz`. ()I"" 'l`}§X/L\S

J.

{Ol’.ER'l` I{EVEN BOULI)S

l'413`(`/ I"O`UR. SIXES

-1»0CKLE.Y,'1‘X 774-47 §;,;§,

ZCIC CODE: 1115 35

:xJONY C_`I~IARGE: AUSE NG:

fARRIS COUNTY DIS'I`RIC'I` CGURT N():

r~z.€"‘, ;f$'§.i,§

“"XB

§§

AGC l §}&*€;3155

lRST SE'}"I`lNG DATE:

EXH 1321 ‘“A“

\1’-"1\'!

,.'-. '~‘

aug

,SPN: DOB; lh\'l ()3/13/71 I);»\'l`E PHEI’/-\RED: 8/4/2()04

I{ELA'l`ED CASES:

AVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT -CHILD

,’il~'§illh`

\’ 'l`I'IE NAME AI\"D l’»Y AU'I`I»I()Rl'l`Y Ol" 'I`HE STATE OF 'I`EXAS:

r\`dL \)Z)E

D./\. Lc)C, NL;MP,EF;:_‘)7‘)(.2‘; C;us 'l`RACKlNG N';)..~

.` x. - _ "‘“*X‘*‘& 4310‘“31391':)';'1‘»»' DA No 1=(,54';1,;0\)

A.C‘)L'§NCY:HCSO (,"/R NC).' 04071331'."'7 A.l?LR.EST Di\'l`E: 'I`OBE

izAh_I: mrmm`v~»/ P.RlORCAl SE NC):

11.1!:\_ 1".11 l 1{\ \ j-,. .[1.“:_""" !( /

he duly oigauized Grzmd lur)' of Hurris Count_v, 'I'exas plesenls in the_ District Court ofHurris <"<)unly Tcxas, that in Harx'is County, 'l`exz\<

KEVEN BOULI)S hel<:uflcr slyicd the Defcndum, herclc)foxc on 01 about .]ULY" ~, 2()04, did than and lhch unlawfuli_,', intentionain

ul knowingly cause the penehution of the l EM¢\LE SEXUAL ORG AN of S/\VANNA WHI lE hereinaflel called the Compluinzml, n person )unger than fourteen years of age amd nol thc spc)usc: 0(` the Dcfcndzml, by plating HIS SEXUAL ORGAN in the FEMALE SEXUAL ORGAN

"thc Comphlinunt.

GAINS'I` '1`1113 l’!£ACE /\Nl) l)lGNI'l'Y Ol" 'l`l'lE S'I`A'l`l£.

3371'}!

'(')F

lNl)lC'I`IvH",NT

?`OREM/A¢’. //_,,1.£2.~- /L-.)Z~w

filf`f“P/\ H\ HU)\'- n

:/ l /’ // ,_/ / _/ `\` ."l! C. .';") . .( ". _: (',.'. I`"

»~4'

l€e¢we.s~l'm_i c E\/rr,(@/r//z;-_.i-\/ !/émm_g

opinion issued october 29, 2015

In The Court of Appeals

For The *"~

First District of Texas

NO. 01-15-00654-CR

IN RE ROBERT K. BOULDS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Robert K. Boulds, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing respondent to perform his “rninisterial duties” relating to relator’s application for a Writ of habeas corpus.l

We dismiss relator’s petition for a Writ of mandamus.

Relator’s petition identifies the underlying case as Cause No. 996316, T he State of

Texas v. Robert K. Boula’s, in the l76th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Stacey W. Bond presiding

Because relator’s petition reflects that he has filed an article ll.07 application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court, his mandamus petition relates to a pending post-conviction habeas corpus application involving a final felony conviction. This Court does not have jurisdiction to grant relator’s requested , relief. Only the Texas Court of Criminal l Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction habeas`corpus proceedings See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. ll.07 (West 2015); P:zdl`eu v. Ct. App. of Tex., Fz`fth Dist., 392 S.W.3d llS, ll7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, any complaints about inaction on matters relating to relator’s post-conviction application for a Writ of habeas corpus must be brought in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See fn re Bri'scoe, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196 (Tex. App._Houston [l4th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (“Article ll.O7 contains no role for the courts of appeals.”); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.-Houston [lst Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (noting that “only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post-conviction felony proceedings”). We have no authority to issue Writs of mandamus in criminal law

matters relating to final post-conviction felony proceedings. See In re McAfee, 53

S.W.Sd at718.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s application for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction and dismiss the motion for leave to file as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boulds, Robert Keven, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Boulds, Robert Keven (Boulds, Robert Keven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. State
96 S.W.3d 497 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
In Re Briscoe
230 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Denby v. State
627 S.W.2d 435 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1981)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Ex Parte Hawkins
885 S.W.2d 586 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)