Bouldin v. . Daniel

65 S.E. 1001, 151 N.C. 283, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 251
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 11, 1909·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Upon an examination of the record in this case, the Court is of opinion that the questions involved are entirely questions of fact and that they have been settled by the verdict of the jury.

We find no merit in the assignments of error relating to the evidence and the charge.

The motion of the defendant for a' new trial, based upon the defendant’s affidavit in respect to the testimony of Yanderford, *284 is a matter strictly within the sound discretion of the judge below. The same is true in regard to a motion for new trial for that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence'. Freeman v. Bell, 150 N. C., 146; Benton v. Railroad, 122 N. C., 1009.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bouldin v. . Daniel, 65 S.E. 1001, 151 N.C. 283, 1909 N.C. LEXIS 251 (N.C. 1909).

65 S.E. 1001 (Bouldin v. . Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. . Morris
166 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Beck v. Sylva Tanning Co.
101 S.E. 498 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)
State v. . McGlammery
91 S.E. 371 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)
Byrd v. . Hudson
18 S.E. 209 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)