Bouland v. Erwin Keith Inc

2013 Ark. App. 460

• Court: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
• Decided: August 28, 2013
• Docket: CV-13-601
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 460

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS No. CV-13-601

Opinion Delivered August 28, 2013 CHARLES BOULAND APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION V. COMMISSION [No. G001643] ERWIN KEITH, INC., and BRIDGEFIELD CASUALTY APPELLEES MOTION MOOT; APPEAL LODGED

PER CURIAM

Before the court is a pleading styled “Motion for Rule on Clerk” submitted by Ronnie

Ray Long, Jr., who purports to be the representative of Charles Bouland, the appellant in this

matter. Long, who is not an attorney, appeared before the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation

Commission as representative of Bouland pursuant to the authority of Arkansas Code

Annotated section 11-9-704(c)(1)(A)(i) (Repl. 2012), which permits non-attorney representatives

in proceedings before the Commission. On May 23, 2013, the Commission filed a decision

denying Bouland’s claim for benefits, and on June 3, 2013, Long timely filed a notice of appeal

of the Commission’s decision.

On July 10, 2013, Long tendered the record for Bouland’s appeal to the clerk of the

Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. The clerk refused to lodge the record because

Long was not a licensed attorney. However, the clerk suggested that Long file a motion for rule

on the clerk, and Long filed said motion on July 10, 2013. Rule 2.2 of the Rules of the Supreme

Court and Court of Appeals recognizes a motion for rule on the clerk when a record is tendered Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 460

late, the appellant believes it is timely, and the clerk is in error in refusing to file it. Ark. Sup. Ct.

R. 2.2 (2013). While the applicability of Rule 2.2 to the instant case is questionable, the issue of

lodging the record is before us.

While Long is not a licensed attorney, the mere act of tendering a record and filing fee

is not limited to practicing attorneys. Any third-party friend, employee, or paid courier can

tender a record and filing fee to the clerk’s office. However, by filing a motion in the Arkansas

Court of Appeals, Long has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, in violation of

Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-22-206 (Repl. 1999).1 The authority of Long, a non-

attorney, to represent Bouland before the Commission under section 11-9-704 does not extend

to courts of record. Id.; see also Abel v. Kowalski, 323 Ark. 201, 913 S.W.2d 788 (1996) (holding

that in Arkansas a person who is not a licensed attorney may not file a motion in the supreme

court or the court of appeals because it would violate the rule prohibiting the unauthorized

practice of law).

Therefore, the clerk is ordered to lodge the record showing Bouland appearing pro se.

Bouland may proceed pro se or hire an attorney to represent him in his appeal. The court

declines to impose any sanctions on Long in light of the clerk’s suggestion that he file the

motion.

The clerk is ordered to lodge the record; the motion is moot.

Ronnie Ray Long, Jr., for appellant. No response.

1 Section 16-22-206 provides, “No person shall be licensed or permitted to practice law in any of the courts of record in this state until he has been admitted to practice by the Supreme Court of this state, and every person so admitted shall be entitled to practice in all the courts of this state.”

2 Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 460