Bouknight v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bouknight v. Russi

242 A.D.2d 329, 661 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8311

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 18, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 329 (Bouknight v. Russi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bouknight v. Russi, 242 A.D.2d 329, 661 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole, dated April 18, 1995, which denied his request to be released on parole, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), entered June 4, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Because the respondent acted in accordance with statutory requirements, the discretionary denial of parole is not subject to judicial review (see, Executive Law § 259-i [5]; Matter of Heitman v New York State Bd. of Parole, 214 AD2d 673; People ex rel. Thomas v Superintendent, 124 AD2d 848, 849). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole, dated April 18, 1995, which denied his request to be released on parole, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), entered June 4, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Because the respondent acted in accordance with statutory requirements, the discretionary denial of parole is not subject to judicial review (see, Executive Law § 259-i [5]; Matter of Heitman v New York State Bd. of Parole, 214 AD2d 673; People ex rel. Thomas v Superintendent, 124 AD2d 848, 849). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 329, 661 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouknight-v-russi-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack