Bouie v. State
791 So. 2d 1194, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 2001 WL 910079
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bouie v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 784 So. 2d 521 →
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. However, this affirmance does not imply that excluding a person from jury service on the basis of gender is not constitutionally prohibited. See J.E.B. v. Alabama, 511 U.S. 127, 114 S.Ct. 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bouie v. State, 791 So. 2d 1194, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395, 2001 WL 910079 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
791 So. 2d 1194 (Bouie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB
511 U.S. 127 (Supreme Court, 1994)
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.
511 U.S. 127 (Supreme Court, 1994)