Bouie, Priscilla v. Kirkland's Stores Incorporated
Opinion
Order entered August 8, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00453-CV
PRISCILLA BOUIE, Appellant
V.
KIRKLAND’S STORES, INCORPORATED, Appellee
On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-00666-2011
ORDER We received appellant’s principal brief on February 4, 2013. After we gave her notice
that the brief was defective in several respects, appellant filed an amended brief on February 21.
Appellee then filed its brief on March 1. Appellant sought an extension of time to file her reply
brief, and we extended her deadline to April 21. On April 22, she filed another motion for
extension of time, seeking a ninety-day extension of time to file “Petitioner's Brief on the
Merits” on or before July 22. We construe this motion as a motion for extension of time to file a
reply brief.
Appellant did not file a reply brief within the ninety-day time period she requested in her
motion. Accordingly, appellant’s April 22, 2013 Motion for Extension of Time to File
Petitioner’s Brief on the Merits is DENIED. /s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bouie, Priscilla v. Kirkland's Stores Incorporated (Bouie, Priscilla v. Kirkland's Stores Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.