Boudreaux v. R.E. Heidt Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Boudreaux v. R.E. Heidt Construction Co.

1 So. 3d 462, 2009 La. LEXIS 1220

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 18, 2009

DocketNo. 2009-CC-0307

StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 462 (Boudreaux v. R.E. Heidt Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boudreaux v. R.E. Heidt Construction Co., 1 So. 3d 462, 2009 La. LEXIS 1220 (La. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Louisiana State of; Transportation & Devi. Dept, of; — Defendant(s); Applying For, Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 82,935-C; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 08-01311.

Granted. The trial court did not abuse its great discretion in granting the motion in limine. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

JOHNSON, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Louisiana State of; Transportation & Devi. Dept, of; — Defendant(s); Applying For, Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 82,935-C; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 08-01311.

Granted. The trial court did not abuse its great discretion in granting the motion in limine. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.

JOHNSON, J., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 3d 462, 2009 La. LEXIS 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boudreaux-v-re-heidt-construction-co-la-2009.