Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Boudreau v. Damas Food Mart Corp.

Boudreau v. Damas Food Mart Corp.

52 Misc. 2d 930, 277 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1318
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 17, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 Misc. 2d 930 (Boudreau v. Damas Food Mart Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boudreau v. Damas Food Mart Corp., 52 Misc. 2d 930, 277 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with $30 costs, and verdict reinstated. While a court may set aside a jury’s verdict for insufficiency, its discretion nevertheless is limited. In this negligence action it cannot be said that the verdict was so inadequate as to reflect bias or prejudice on the part of the jury, warranting the trial court in setting the verdict aside as shocking to the conscience of the court. On the evidence, it appears that the amount awarded represents a fair assessment of damages.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Tilzer and Gold, JJ,

Order reversed, etc,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manshul Construction Corp. v. Dormitory Authority of New York
111 Misc. 2d 209 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Mondella v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad
62 Misc. 2d 989 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Misc. 2d 930, 277 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boudreau-v-damas-food-mart-corp-nyappterm-1966.