Boudin v. Tishman
264 A.D. 842, 35 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4981
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 1942·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty doEars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boudin v. Tishman, 264 A.D. 842, 35 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
264 A.D. 842 (Boudin v. Tishman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGaw v. Webster
440 P.2d 296 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1968)
Ward v. Forest Preserve District
141 N.E.2d 753 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1957)
Foltz v. News Syndicate Co.
114 F. Supp. 599 (S.D. New York, 1953)
Ward v. League for Justice
93 N.E.2d 723 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)
Mencher v. Chesley
75 N.E.2d 257 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
Wright v. Farm Journal, Inc.
158 F.2d 976 (Second Circuit, 1947)
Mencher v. Chesley
186 Misc. 877 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Grant v. Reader's Digest Ass'n
151 F.2d 733 (Second Circuit, 1945)