Boudin v. Clarren
46 N.E.2d 346, 289 N.Y. 724, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1293
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., on the ground that the appellant is entitled to a trial of the question whether the contract was obtained by fraud, and a trial may not be denied to her even assuming that her affidavits show there is no substantial ground for her claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boudin v. Clarren, 46 N.E.2d 346, 289 N.Y. 724, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1293 (N.Y. 1942).
46 N.E.2d 346 (Boudin v. Clarren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feuerring
71 N.E.2d 454 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)