Boudin v. Clarren

New York Court of Appeals

Boudin v. Clarren

46 N.E.2d 346, 289 N.Y. 724, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1293

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 3, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 N.E.2d 346 (Boudin v. Clarren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boudin v. Clarren, 46 N.E.2d 346, 289 N.Y. 724, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1293 (N.Y. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., on the ground that the appellant is entitled to a trial of the question whether the contract was obtained by fraud, and a trial may not be denied to her even assuming that her affidavits show there is no substantial ground for her claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Dissenting: Lehman, Ch. J., on the ground that the appellant is entitled to a trial of the question whether the contract was obtained by fraud, and a trial may not be denied to her even assuming that her affidavits show there is no substantial ground for her claim.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 N.E.2d 346, 289 N.Y. 724, 1942 N.Y. LEXIS 1293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boudin-v-clarren-ny-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack