Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Boudali v. State

Boudali v. State

731 So. 2d 166, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5718, 1999 WL 270446
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2924
StatusPublished

This text of 731 So. 2d 166 (Boudali v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boudali v. State, 731 So. 2d 166, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5718, 1999 WL 270446 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

More than four years after he was sentenced, and as a result of deportation proceedings, appellant filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis, alleging that his plea was involuntary in that he had not been properly advised that his plea could lead to deportation. This court has determined that petitions such as the one filed by appellant are barred by laches where they have been filed more than two years after judgment and sentence have become final. State v. Taylor, 722 So.2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Elise, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D464, 727 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Affirmed.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Taylor
722 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
State v. Elise
727 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
731 So. 2d 166, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5718, 1999 WL 270446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boudali-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.