Boucher v. Satterfield
This text of 4 Ky. Op. 624 (Boucher v. Satterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
It may be inferred from what is stated in the bill of exceptions that it contains all .the evidence adduced on the trial by appellant, but there is no statement that it contains all the evidence heard on the trial on behalf of appellee. And in the absence of such statement this court can not reverse a judgment because it is founded on a verdict rendered-contrary to evidence.
All the instructions given appear to have been asked by appellant, or if not they were not objected to, and they appear as favorable as he was entitled to have them. And as no available error for reversal is presented, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ky. Op. 624, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boucher-v-satterfield-kyctapp-1871.