Bouche v. Ryan
3 Blackf. 472, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 60
This text of 3 Blackf. 472 (Bouche v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bouche v. Ryan, 3 Blackf. 472, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 60 (Ind. 1834).
Opinion
IF the plaintiff is an infant, the form of the writ may be the same as in other cases, but the declaration must be by guardian or next friend
A defendant, by obliging the plaintiff to give security for costs, does not waive the right to plead the infancy of the plaintiff in abatement.
An infant plaintiff is not liable for costs. 1 Tidd, 72.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kleffel v. Bullock
8 Neb. 336 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1879)
Holmes v. Adkins
2 Ind. 398 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1850)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Blackf. 472, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouche-v-ryan-ind-1834.