Bouche v. Ryan

3 Blackf. 472, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 60
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 8, 1834·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

IF the plaintiff is an infant, the form of the writ may be the same as in other cases, but the declaration must be by guardian or next friend (1).

A defendant, by obliging the plaintiff to give security for costs, does not waive the right to plead the infancy of the plaintiff in abatement.

An infant plaintiff is not liable for costs. 1 Tidd, 72.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bouche v. Ryan, 3 Blackf. 472, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 60 (Ind. 1834).

3 Blackf. 472 (Bouche v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kleffel v. Bullock
8 Neb. 336 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1879)
Holmes v. Adkins
2 Ind. 398 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1850)