Bouchard v. West Side Structural Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bouchard v. West Side Structural Co.

63 A.D.2d 1091, 406 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.2d 1091 (Bouchard v. West Side Structural Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bouchard v. West Side Structural Co., 63 A.D.2d 1091, 406 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered April 22, 1976 in Washington County, which denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, and (2) a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered April 25, 1977 in Washington County, upon a verdict rendered at a Trial Term in favor of plaintiff. We have examined the record and find no error in the denial of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and no reason to disturb the factual findings implicit in the jury’s verdict. We are likewise unpersuaded by the legal issues raised by defendant and, accordingly, the order and judgment should be affirmed. Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered April 22, 1976 in Washington County, which denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment, and (2) a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered April 25, 1977 in Washington County, upon a verdict rendered at a Trial Term in favor of plaintiff. We have examined the record and find no error in the denial of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and no reason to disturb the factual findings implicit in the jury’s verdict. We are likewise unpersuaded by the legal issues raised by defendant and, accordingly, the order and judgment should be affirmed. Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 1091, 406 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouchard-v-west-side-structural-co-nyappdiv-1978.