Bouchard v. Sinaguglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bouchard v. Sinaguglia

16 A.D.2d 1030, 230 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8893

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 1030 (Bouchard v. Sinaguglia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bouchard v. Sinaguglia, 16 A.D.2d 1030, 230 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide event. Memorandum: The jury found a verdict of no cause for action. But the weight of the evidence indicates an impact with the plaintiff’s wife at a crosswalk on a public street in the nighttime on the defendant’s wrong side of the highway, without warning and without proper vigilance on defendant’s part. The verdict, therefore, was against the weight of the evidence and should be reversed. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, J J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide event. Memorandum: The jury found a verdict of no cause for action. But the weight of the evidence indicates an impact with the plaintiff’s wife at a crosswalk on a public street in the nighttime on the defendant’s wrong side of the highway, without warning and without proper vigilance on defendant’s part. The verdict, therefore, was against the weight of the evidence and should be reversed. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term for defendant for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, J J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 1030, 230 N.Y.S.2d 65, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bouchard-v-sinaguglia-nyappdiv-1962.