Bouari v. United States of America

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: January 11, 2021
• Docket: 2:18-cv-00219
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 GHASSAN HOUBOUS BOUARI, Case No. 2:18-CV-219 JCM (PAL)

8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER

9 v.

10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

11 Defendant(s).

12 13 Presently before the court is defendant United States of America’s motion to dismiss 14 (ECF No. 12). Also before the court is defendants Elena Iatarola, Dennis Lao, and Charles 15 Ro’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 13). 16 This is a Bivens action alleging that FBI special agents Lao and Ro fabricated 17 evidence in a malicious prosecution and detained plaintiff Ghassan Houbous Bouari without 18 probable cause in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. (ECF No. 31 ¶ 18). After the 19 two instant motions to dismiss were filed, Houbous filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 20 31). The amendment complaint dropped all claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act 21 (“FTCA”). (See ECF No. 28 (stipulation to dismiss without prejudice any claims under the 22 FTCA)). It also consolidated and/or dropped four original Bivens claims, resulting in a 23 single Bivens claim against Lao and Ro. (See ECF No. 30 (order granting unopposed motion 24 for leave to file first amended complaint)). As a result, defendants United States of America 25 and Elena Iatarola have been terminated from this case. 26 An amended complaint “supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as 27 non-existent.” Ramirez v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015) 28 (quoting Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997)); see also Ferdik v. 1| Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). Consequently, an amended complaint will 2| ordinarily moot a pending motion to dismiss the original complaint. See Ramirez, 806 F.3d 3) at 1008. A Accordingly, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendant United States of America’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Iatarola, Lao, and Ro’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay on this case is lifted as the indictment of 11 | the last remaining defendant in the related criminal case, USA v. Bouari et al, 2:16-cr-00032- 12} JCM-EJY, was dismissed on August 3, 2020. (See ECF No. 10 (order granting joint motion 13 | to stay proceedings pending resolution of the related criminal case)). 14 DATED January 11, 2021. 15 a ttus ©. Atallan 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

es C. Mahan District Judge _2-