Bouari v. United States of America

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 11, 2021·No. 2:18-cv-00219·Unknown

Opinion

* * *

GHASSAN HOUBOUS BOUARI, Case No. 2:18-CV-219 JCM (PAL)

Plaintiff(s), ORDER

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendant(s).

Presently before the court is defendant United States of America’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12). Also before the court is defendants Elena Iatarola, Dennis Lao, and Charles Ro’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 13). This is a Bivens action alleging that FBI special agents Lao and Ro fabricated evidence in a malicious prosecution and detained plaintiff Ghassan Houbous Bouari without probable cause in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. (ECF No. 31 ¶ 18). After the two instant motions to dismiss were filed, Houbous filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 31). The amendment complaint dropped all claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). (See ECF No. 28 (stipulation to dismiss without prejudice any claims under the FTCA)). It also consolidated and/or dropped four original Bivens claims, resulting in a single Bivens claim against Lao and Ro. (See ECF No. 30 (order granting unopposed motion for leave to file first amended complaint)). As a result, defendants United States of America and Elena Iatarola have been terminated from this case. An amended complaint “supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent.” Ramirez v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997)); see also Ferdik v. 1 Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). Consequently, an amended complaint will ordinarily moot a pending motion to dismiss the original complaint. See Ramirez, 806 F.3d 3) at 1008. A Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendant United States of America’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 12) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Iatarola, Lao, and Ro’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay on this case is lifted as the indictment of the last remaining defendant in the related criminal case, USA v. Bouari et al, 2:16-cr-00032- 12} JCM-EJY, was dismissed on August 3, 2020. (See ECF No. 10 (order granting joint motion to stay proceedings pending resolution of the related criminal case)). DATED January 11, 2021. a ttus ©. Atallan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

es C. Mahan District Judge _2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bouari v. United States of America, (D. Nev. 2021).

Bouari v. United States of America (Bouari v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, Sheriff
963 F.2d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Oppenheimer-Torres
806 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2015)
Sergio Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino
806 F.3d 1002 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.
114 F.3d 1467 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)