Botwinik v. Dlugacz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Botwinik v. Dlugacz

10 A.D.2d 676, 202 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11416

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 676 (Botwinik v. Dlugacz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Botwinik v. Dlugacz, 10 A.D.2d 676, 202 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the defendant’s appeal to be heard on the record previously filed by the plaintiffs-appellants, together with a supplemental record containing a corrected statement under rule 234 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the defendant-appellant’s notice of appeal and the defendant-appellant’s answer, on condition that the defendant-appellant pays to the plaintiffs-appellants within 20 days [677]*677after the entry of the order herein one half the costs of obtaining the stenographic minutes of the trial, the photostatic copies of the exhibits and the printing of the record on appeal. The cross appeals are to be noticed for the same term of this court and are to be argued or submitted together. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the defendant’s appeal to be heard on the record previously filed by the plaintiffs-appellants, together with a supplemental record containing a corrected statement under rule 234 of the Rules of Civil Practice, the defendant-appellant’s notice of appeal and the defendant-appellant’s answer, on condition that the defendant-appellant pays to the plaintiffs-appellants within 20 days [677]*677after the entry of the order herein one half the costs of obtaining the stenographic minutes of the trial, the photostatic copies of the exhibits and the printing of the record on appeal. The cross appeals are to be noticed for the same term of this court and are to be argued or submitted together. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 676, 202 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/botwinik-v-dlugacz-nyappdiv-1960.