Botwinik v. Botwinik

Supreme Court of Florida

Botwinik v. Botwinik

93 So. 2d 574, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3323

DecidedMarch 13, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 2d 574 (Botwinik v. Botwinik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Botwinik v. Botwinik, 93 So. 2d 574, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3323 (Fla. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A.Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;

It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is

Affirmed on authority of Kearley v. Hunter, Fla., 16 So.2d 728, 152 A.L.R. 185.

TERRELL, C. J., and PIOBSON, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI