Botto v. Bosley

995 S.W.2d 544, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 966
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 20, 1999·No. No. 73782·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals the adverse summary judgment entered upon his Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) claim and retaliatory discharge claim. We have carefully reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Botto v. Bosley, 995 S.W.2d 544, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 966 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

995 S.W.2d 544 (Botto v. Bosley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Chenega Corporation
E.D. Missouri, 2024