Bottner v. Bottner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bottner v. Bottner

43 A.D.2d 913, 352 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5791

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 913 (Bottner v. Bottner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bottner v. Bottner, 43 A.D.2d 913, 352 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 24, 1972, which awarded plaintiff counsel fees in the sum of $5,000 for the prosecution of an appeal to this court and in opposing a cross appeal by the husband, unanimously [914]*914modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reducing the award to $3,000, which sum shall be deemed to include any services on the instant appeal, and otherwise the order is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Taking into consideration all the relevant criteria, we find that under all the circumstances the award made was excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 24, 1972, which awarded plaintiff counsel fees in the sum of $5,000 for the prosecution of an appeal to this court and in opposing a cross appeal by the husband, unanimously [914]*914modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reducing the award to $3,000, which sum shall be deemed to include any services on the instant appeal, and otherwise the order is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Taking into consideration all the relevant criteria, we find that under all the circumstances the award made was excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 913, 352 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bottner-v-bottner-nyappdiv-1974.