Bottigliero v. Polakow

Appellate Court of Illinois

Bottigliero v. Polakow

185 Ill. App. 186

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 5, 1914

DocketGen. No. 18,727

StatusPublished

This text of 185 Ill. App. 186 (Bottigliero v. Polakow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bottigliero v. Polakow, 185 Ill. App. 186 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Indemnity, §. 25*—amount recoverable. In an action by the purshaser of realty against the vendor to recover for the amount expended in redeeming from a sale of the premises on foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, the vendor having given an agreement to indemnify, defendant contended that attorney’s fees paid by plaintiff in redeeming and the fee for filing the certificate of redemption were improperly included in the judgment because no written notice had been given to him of the filing of the mechanic’s lien suit. Held, the finding of the trial court that such notice had been given was not manifestly against the weight of evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Indemnity, §. 25*—amount recoverable. In an action by the purshaser of realty against the vendor to recover for the amount expended in redeeming from a sale of the premises on foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, the vendor having given an agreement to indemnify, defendant contended that attorney’s fees paid by plaintiff in redeeming and the fee for filing the certificate of redemption were improperly included in the judgment because no written notice had been given to him of the filing of the mechanic’s lien suit. Held, the finding of the trial court that such notice had been given was not manifestly against the weight of evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 Ill. App. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bottigliero-v-polakow-illappct-1914.