Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad

33 A.D.2d 756, 305 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order entered May 20, 1969, denying defendant’s motion for a protective order, unanimously modified on the facts and the law, without costs or disbursements, to provide that the examination of defendant’s employees shall be in Jacksonville, Florida, and, at the election of plaintiffs, shall be by written interrogatories or open commission. If plaintiffs elect to examine by open commission, the parties shall pay their respective expenses, which shall be taxed as costs by the prevailing party. Otherwise the order is affirmed. The requirement that witnesses travel a thousand miles is onerous and likely unnecessary. If the witnesses should come to New York for the trial or for any reason prior thereto, plaintiffs shall be advised beforehand and accorded the opportunity of conducting the examination directed. (See Pakter v. Lilly & Co., 19 A D 2d 810; Piel v. Lilly & Co., 19 A D 2d 810; Winds v. Hydropress, 279 App. Div. 1005.) Defendant’s brief offers to submit the witnesses for examination in New York City about one week before trial. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad, 33 A.D.2d 756, 305 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

33 A.D.2d 756 (Bottalico v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiseman v. American Motors Sales Corp.
103 A.D.2d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
In re the Estate of Postley
125 Misc. 2d 416 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1984)