Botta v. North Hempstead Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Botta v. North Hempstead Country Club

26 A.D.2d 829, 275 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3264

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 829 (Botta v. North Hempstead Country Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Botta v. North Hempstead Country Club, 26 A.D.2d 829, 275 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered [830]*830December 21,1965, in defendant’s favor upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, though it was error not to permit plaintiff! to state what directions the waiter on the premises had given plaintiff to find the toilet, nevertheless, in the context of this case and considering what the jury had heard on this facet of the case and in view of the charge to the jury thereon,no prejudice resulted to plaintiff and a reversal is not warranted (CPLR 2002). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered [830]*830December 21,1965, in defendant’s favor upon a jury verdict. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, though it was error not to permit plaintiff! to state what directions the waiter on the premises had given plaintiff to find the toilet, nevertheless, in the context of this case and considering what the jury had heard on this facet of the case and in view of the charge to the jury thereon,no prejudice resulted to plaintiff and a reversal is not warranted (CPLR 2002). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 829, 275 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/botta-v-north-hempstead-country-club-nyappdiv-1966.