Bott v. Stoner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Bott v. Stoner

2 Pennyp. 154

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 29, 1882

DocketNo. 26

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Pennyp. 154 (Bott v. Stoner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bott v. Stoner, 2 Pennyp. 154 (Pa. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

This suit was-not against the defendants as partners, and the offer, the rejection of which is complained of in the first assignment, was rightly rejected. There was nothing in the evidence offered to show that Staman communicated to Stoner the fact that he was authorized by the plaintiff to speak with him on the subject, and the evidence offered was therefore rightly rejected.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam:

This suit was-not against the defendants as partners, and the offer, the rejection of which is complained of in the first assignment, was rightly rejected. There was nothing in the evidence offered to show that Staman communicated to Stoner the fact that he was authorized by the plaintiff to speak with him on the subject, and the evidence offered was therefore rightly rejected.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Pennyp. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bott-v-stoner-pa-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack